An in­ter­view with

Cia­ra Con­way | Ap­pli­ca­ti­on Spe­cia­list

“Breakth­rough in­no­va­ti­on oc­curs when we bring down boun­da­ries and en­cou­ra­ge di­sci­pli­nes to learn from each other.”

– Gyan Nag­pal

1) What is your role at Plas­mi­on?

Ori­gi­nal­ly, I was brought on as part of the sa­les team at the end of 2022, but quick­ly mo­ved into Data Ana­ly­tics and Lab Ma­nage­ment. In the­se ro­les, I help con­tri­bu­te to our Re­se­arch and De­ve­lo­p­ment in both lab and soft­ware ap­pli­ca­ti­ons.

2) What skills do you bring from your pre­vious work that help you here?

With pre­vious ex­pe­ri­ence both as a syn­the­tic che­mist and bio­in­for­ma­ti­ci­an, I help bridge the gap bet­ween the wet lab and com­pu­ta­tio­nal lab to im­pro­ve in­ter­nal and ex­ter­nal work­flows th­rough au­to­ma­ti­on.

3) What is spe­cial about Plas­mi­on as a com­pa­ny?

What makes Plas­mi­on so spe­cial is the abili­ty to ex­plo­re and re­se­arch new ap­pli­ca­ti­ons. We are gi­ven the free­dom to be crea­ti­ve in our thought pro­cess and how we ap­proach the so­lu­ti­on to a pro­blem. Ad­di­tio­nal­ly, we are ex­tre­me­ly sup­port­i­ve of each other and the ide­as or im­pro­ve­ments peo­p­le sug­gest, which makes the working en­vi­ron­ment far more en­joya­ble.

4) If you had un­li­mi­t­ed re­sour­ces, what ground­brea­king idea would you work on?

If I had all the re­sour­ces and time at my dis­po­sal, I would work so­le­ly on stu­dy­ing the in­ter­ac­tions of out­side to­xins on the hu­man body and how it can lead to de­bi­li­ta­ting out­co­mes. I would do this by pro­vi­ding peo­p­le with free per­so­na­li­zed me­di­cal test­ing and free third par­ty test­ing of the pro­ducts they use dai­ly or have been ex­po­sed to. Here, we can bring tog­e­ther lab work and ma­chi­ne lear­ning to give peo­p­le the ans­wers they need wi­t­hout drai­ning them of time and mo­ney.

5) How of­ten do you come across ex­ci­ting dis­co­veries that turn out not to be eco­no­mic­al­ly fe­a­si­ble?

All the time. My en­ti­re PhD is ar­gu­ab­ly a se­ries of dis­co­veries that are not eco­no­mic­al­ly fe­a­si­ble and of­ten be­ne­fit the fun­da­men­tals of the field in­s­tead of the ap­pli­ca­bi­li­ty. I per­so­nal­ly think it’s that tech­no­lo­gy has­n’t caught up yet to make the­se fun­da­men­tal dis­co­veries eco­no­mic­al­ly fe­a­si­ble.

6) Which cur­rent tech­no­lo­gi­cal de­ve­lo­p­ment will most stron­gly ch­an­ge the way you con­duct re­se­arch in the co­ming ye­ars?

Any at­mo­sphe­ric pres­su­re io­niza­ti­on tech­ni­que. I think once I was ex­po­sed to a tech­no­lo­gy that could be ad­apt­ed to al­most all my ide­as in the lab, the­re’s no way I could go back to do­ing re­se­arch the way I used to. I never thought I’d wil­lingly go back into the lab af­ter do­ing a de­gree in bio­in­for­ma­tics, but this type of tech­no­lo­gy con­vin­ced me I can be a good lab sci­en­tist and a good co­der and bring my skill set tog­e­ther in a co­he­si­ve man­ner.

7) What unu­su­al or crea­ti­ve me­thods do you use to dri­ve in­no­va­ti­on?

I read sci­ence fiction/fantasy books and I knit com­pul­si­ve­ly. Most of my in­spi­ra­ti­on for in­no­va­ti­on or ide­as co­mes to me while I’m re­a­ding or when I’m sit­ting the­re mind­less­ly ma­king a swea­ter. It’s just put­ting my brain in a sta­te of calm­ness whe­re so­me­thing just pops in my head out of nowhe­re.

8) What has been the most ex­ci­ting “aha” mo­ment in your care­er – and what came out of it?

Rea­li­zing that start­ing over is­n’t al­ways a set­back in the long run. So­me­ti­mes to achie­ve a par­ti­cu­lar goal we have to be wil­ling to tear down and re­build parts of our li­ves from the ground up. It’s this mind­set that al­lo­wed me to lea­ve the US and pur­sue a care­er in Ger­ma­ny. So I would say I’m in a pret­ty good place now.