Interview Divya

In­ter­view with our Ap­pli­ca­ti­on Spe­cia­list:
Dr. Di­vya Ramesh

Wel­co­me to our new edi­ti­on of our se­ries Em­ployee In­ter­views, whe­re we dive into the per­so­nal ex­pe­ri­en­ces, chal­lenges, and in­sights of our team mem­bers. Meet Di­vya, our Ap­pli­ca­ti­on Spe­cia­list, and learn more about her per­spec­ti­ve on and ex­pe­ri­en­ces in the field.

What is the most com­mon mis­con­cep­ti­on cus­to­mers have about your pro­duct or ser­vice?

A pre­re­qui­si­te of the SICRIT® source, is an LCMS. What is meant here by an LCMS is a mass spec­tro­me­ter with an at­mo­sphe­ric pres­su­re in­let, which all mass spec­tro­me­ters that con­nect to a li­quid chro­ma­to­gra­phy sys­tem are. Ho­we­ver, SICRIT® is ver­sa­ti­le, al­lo­wing us to con­nect any up­front chro­ma­to­gra­phy sys­tem, or none. Mea­ning, alt­hough we need an LCMS, we are not li­mi­t­ed to using an LC.

What was the most chal­len­ging si­tua­ti­on you en­coun­te­red on-site with a cus­to­mer – and how did you sol­ve it?

Du­ring a demo once, I was with a cus­to­mer working on some ana­lytes in com­ple­te­ly un­pro­ces­sed ma­tri­ces. We were try­ing to me­a­su­re the ana­lytes di­rect­ly wi­t­hout any sam­ple pre­pa­ra­ti­on. At one point the­re was si­gnal sa­tu­ra­ti­on and sup­pres­si­on, so I thought the mo­du­le had to be clea­ned. I fit­ted a new one, but the­re was still no ch­an­ge. I fi­nal­ly rea­li­zed that the source its­elf was blo­cked, but I did­n’t bring the tool to clean it. I en­ded up using the sy­rin­ge need­le in­s­tead to clean out the litt­le bit of lint that had flown in. In the end we could me­a­su­re again, and the cus­to­mer could see how easy main­ten­an­ce could be.

How of­ten do you have to come up with crea­ti­ve work­arounds be­cau­se a stan­dard so­lu­ti­on doesn’t work?

The­re seems to be a lar­ge and gro­wing list of ‚stan­dard so­lu­ti­ons‘ and I think that speaks to how crea­ti­ve one needs to be. The­re is al­ways a slight­ly dif­fe­rent so­lu­ti­on that works for each cus­to­mer when I’m on a demo. So­me­ti­mes it’s a me­cha­ni­cal fix, so­me­ti­mes swit­ching to a dif­fe­rent sol­vent works and so on. The stan­dard so­lu­ti­on, the­r­e­fo­re, is a crea­ti­ve so­lu­ti­on.

Which tech­no­lo­gi­cal in­no­va­ti­on will have the grea­test im­pact on your work in the co­ming ye­ars?

A mi­nia­tu­re, por­ta­ble, high re­so­lu­ti­on mass spec­tro­me­ter, that can also do tan­dem mass spec­tro­me­try. Tha­t’d be nice and it will open doors to places curr­ent­ly in­ac­ces­si­ble.

If you could im­pro­ve one thing about the col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween cus­to­mers and ma­nu­fac­tu­r­ers, what would it be?

Ma­nu­fac­tu­r­ers hold the up­per hand in the tech­ni­cal know­ledge and the ac­cess to the tech­no­lo­gy; cus­to­mers hold the up­per hand in ac­cess to data and in pro­vi­ding tes­ti­mo­ni­als. Le­ver­aging both would be a good thing to im­pro­ve in the col­la­bo­ra­ti­on.

In the end, in­no­va­ti­on isn’t just about the tools we use, it’s about ad­ap­ta­bi­li­ty, col­la­bo­ra­ti­on, and crea­ti­ve thin­king in real-world si­tua­tions.

Thank you for sha­ring your va­luable in­sights and ex­pe­ri­en­ces with us. We’­re ex­ci­ted to con­ti­nue our jour­ney of #Rethin­king mass spec­tro­me­try tog­e­ther.