Industrial chimney ejecting smother, symbolizing the increasing need for new methods of short-chain PFAS detection

The­re Is So­me­thing in the Air! Short-Chain PFAS De­tec­tion with SICRIT®

They’re in­vi­si­ble, per­sis­tent, and ever­y­whe­re: PFAS are tur­ning up in more places than ever be­fo­re, in­clu­ding the air we brea­the. If you’­re new to PFAS and their en­vi­ron­men­tal im­pact, this over­view ar­tic­le of­fers a com­pre­hen­si­ve in­tro­duc­tion. The awa­re­ness of the he­alth risks po­sed by PFAS is ste­adi­ly gro­wing. Yet de­tec­ting the­se elu­si­ve com­pounds in the at­mo­sphe­re re­mains one of the big­gest ana­ly­ti­cal chal­lenges, espe­ci­al­ly when it co­mes to the smal­lest, most mo­bi­le ty­pes. The good news? A new me­thod cen­te­red around SICRIT® Io­niza­ti­on Tech­no­lo­gy is hel­ping re­se­ar­chers push the boun­da­ries of wha­t’s pos­si­ble in air­bor­ne short-chain PFAS de­tec­tion.

PFAS and The De­tec­tion Gap in Air Mo­ni­to­ring

Per- and po­ly­fluo­ro­al­kyl sub­s­tances (PFAS) are a lar­ge group of hu­man-made che­mi­cals that have been used for de­ca­des in pro­ducts like non-stick pans, wa­ter­pro­of clot­hing, or fire-fight­ing foams. It is their re­sis­tance to wa­ter, grease, and heat that makes them as po­pu­lar as they are, but si­mul­ta­neous­ly it’s the same re­si­li­ence that makes them ex­tre­me­ly per­sis­tent in the en­vi­ron­ment.

Of­ten re­fer­red to as „fo­re­ver che­mi­cals“, PFAS don’t ea­si­ly break down and can ac­cu­mu­la­te in air, wa­ter, soil, and even in li­ving or­ga­nisms. Curr­ent­ly, sci­en­tists have iden­ti­fied over 10,000 dif­fe­rent PFAS com­pounds, many of which are po­or­ly stu­di­ed or not re­gu­la­ted. Re­se­arch in­cre­asing­ly links PFAS ex­po­sure to a ran­ge of po­ten­ti­al he­alth con­cerns, in­clu­ding hor­mo­n­al dis­rup­ti­ons, im­mu­ne sys­tem ef­fects, re­du­ced fer­ti­li­ty, de­ve­lo­p­men­tal de­lays in child­ren, and even cer­tain ty­pes of can­cer. Even more con­cer­ning is their wi­de­spread pre­sence that makes them a world­wi­de en­vi­ron­men­tal con­cern: PFAS have not only been de­tec­ted in the air we brea­the, but also our drin­king wa­ter, house­hold dust, re­mo­te rain­wa­ter, and even in hu­man blood samples across the glo­be.

While to­day re­gu­la­ti­ons have be­gun tar­ge­ting some of the lon­ger-chain le­ga­cy PFAS (like PFOA and PFOS), ma­nu­fac­tu­r­ers have shifted toward short-chain or even ul­tras­hort-chain al­ter­na­ti­ves, such as trifluo­roace­tic acid (TFA). They are less stu­di­ed but just as en­vi­ron­men­tal­ly per­sis­tent and of­ten even har­der to de­tect. This crea­tes a si­gni­fi­cant re­gu­la­to­ry gap but also a sci­en­ti­fic need for ef­fec­ti­ve short-chain PFAS de­tec­tion me­thods.

A New Ana­ly­ti­cal Ap­proach for Short-Chain PFAS De­tec­tion in Air

In a re­cent pa­per, re­se­ar­chers ta­ck­led this ma­jor gap in PFAS re­se­arch: the lack of an ef­fec­ti­ve me­thod to de­tect the en­ti­re ran­ge of PFAS com­pounds in air samples from ul­tras­hort to long-chain spe­ci­es in a sin­gle, re­lia­ble ana­ly­sis.

To sol­ve this, the team de­ve­lo­ped a sol­vent-free, high-sen­si­ti­vi­ty me­thod using so­lid-pha­se mi­cro­ex­tra­c­tion (SPME) com­bi­ned with dielec­tric bar­ri­er di­schar­ge io­niza­ti­on (DBDI) and high-re­so­lu­ti­on tan­dem mass spec­tro­me­try (HRMS/MS). The cen­ter­pie­ce of this set­up? The SICRIT® io­niza­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy.

SICRIT® Helps Clo­se the Gap

Un­li­ke con­ven­tio­nal me­thods, which strugg­le to ac­count for the di­ver­se vo­la­ti­li­ties and po­la­ri­ties of PFAS, the SICRIT® ion source tech­no­lo­gy in­tro­du­ces a fun­da­men­tal­ly broa­der and more ad­ap­ta­ble ap­proach. Tra­di­tio­nal ana­ly­ti­cal set­ups like GC-MS of­ten ex­hi­bit low sen­si­ti­vi­ty for PFAS due to the need for de­ri­va­tiza­ti­on, and they fall short when it co­mes to de­tec­ting long-chain spe­ci­es. On the other hand, LC-ESI-MS is bet­ter sui­ted for me­di­um- to long-chain PFAS, but it strug­gles with the high­ly po­lar and vo­la­ti­le ul­tras­hort-chain com­pounds such as trifluo­roace­tic acid (TFA). Com­pli­ca­ting mat­ters fur­ther, in-source frag­men­ta­ti­on (ISF) is par­ti­cu­lar­ly high for short-chain PFAS due to their lower bond dis­so­cia­ti­on en­er­gies, which com­pro­mi­ses both sen­si­ti­vi­ty and iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on re­lia­bi­li­ty.

With SICRIT®, the re­se­ar­chers achie­ved a full-spec­trum io­niza­ti­on of PFAS from the elu­si­ve ul­tra short-chain to long-chain com­pounds while re­du­cing ISF by over 60%, which im­pro­ves ac­cu­ra­cy and con­fi­dence in iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on. The Sol­vent-free sam­ple prep, thanks to the use of SPME, re­du­ces back­ground and al­lows for ex­cep­tio­nal sen­si­ti­vi­ty, de­tec­ting PFAS at con­cen­tra­ti­ons as low as 0.06 pg/m³.

Using this set­up, the team suc­cessful­ly ana­ly­zed air­bor­ne fine par­ti­cu­la­te mat­ter (PM2.5) samples coll­ec­ted across sea­sons. PFAS were found in all samples which reve­als their ubi­qui­tous pre­sence, with ul­tras­hort-chain TFA be­ing the most do­mi­nant. In­te­res­t­ingly, hig­her con­cen­tra­ti­ons were ob­ser­ved du­ring war­mer months, sug­gest­ing a com­bi­na­ti­on of fac­tors such as enhan­ced vo­la­ti­liza­ti­on at hig­her tem­pe­ra­tures, in­creased agri­cul­tu­ral ap­pli­ca­ti­ons, and ele­va­ted pro­duct usa­ge du­ring war­mer pe­ri­ods. Fur­ther­mo­re, cor­re­la­ti­ons bet­ween PFAS and other pol­lut­ants, such as phtha­la­tes (used in pla­s­tic pro­duc­tion) and fla­me re­tar­dants like OPEs (or­ga­no­phos­pha­te es­ters). This ob­ser­va­ti­on hints at shared emis­si­on sources but also si­mi­lar en­vi­ron­men­tal be­ha­vi­ors like how they par­ti­ti­on bet­ween air and par­tic­les or how they de­gra­de.

This me­ans the new ap­proach not only im­pro­ves de­tec­tion but also of­fers va­luable in­sight into how PFAS move, ch­an­ge, and in­ter­act in the air we brea­the. SICRIT® en­ables re­se­ar­chers to track the full spec­trum, in­clu­ding short-chain com­pounds, with a cla­ri­ty and com­pre­hen­si­ve­ness that was so far out of reach.

The Fu­ture of En­vi­ron­men­tal Mo­ni­to­ring

This stu­dy shows that with SICRIT®, mass spec­tro­me­try is a powerful tool for ta­ck­ling the in­cre­asing­ly com­plex chall­enge of air­bor­ne PFAS de­tec­tion. Its abili­ty to co­ver a full ran­ge of PFAS in one run, com­bi­ned with sol­vent-free sam­ple coll­ec­tion and im­pro­ved data qua­li­ty, marks a step for­ward in en­vi­ron­men­tal ana­ly­sis.

Loo­king ahead, this me­thod as in­no­va­ti­on in short-chain PFAS de­tec­tion can sup­port more ac­cu­ra­te air qua­li­ty mo­ni­to­ring, re­gu­la­to­ry de­cis­i­on-ma­king, and deeper in­sights into PFAS trans­for­ma­ti­on in the at­mo­sphe­re. As re­se­arch con­ti­nues to grow, tools like SICRIT® will play a cri­ti­cal role in ma­king the in­vi­si­ble vi­si­ble and gui­ding aut­ho­ri­ties toward clea­ner air and safer eco­sys­tems.